Amersfoort Open 2024
The draughtsclub ADG has a long tradition of organizing the Amersfoort Open tournament. I've played (and won) the tournament myself twice around 1987. In those years it was mostly a national event, but nowadays also international grandmasters take part. The 2024 edition was won by
Anton van Berkel with 11 points in 7 rounds, followed by Alexander Shvartsman , Thomy Mbongo and Kees Romijn with 10 points.
Anton van Berkel
Alexander Shvartsman - Anton van Berkel 0-2
In the 5th round, Van Berkel booked a spectacular win against former world champion Shvartsman.
29-33!?
With a temporary sacrifice Van Berkel forces the game into an unconventional gametype, and that turns out to be a masterstroke.
21.38x29
22-28
22.32x23
19x28
23.40-34
17-21
24.26x17
12x32
It's important that an immediate attack on the black outpost fails:
25.42-38
11-17
26.38x27
17-21
27.47-42
21x32
28.42-38
6-11
29.38x27
11-17 and white will lose the piece on 27 because
30.43-38? is prohibited due to
28-32
31.37x28
18-22
32.27x18
13x42 B+
The computer slightly prefers the white position now. But from a practical point of view, the black position is much easier to handle. White has to make some tough decisions, while the black moves are easy to find.
≡
25.30-25
11-17
26.44-40
7-12
27.35-30
14-20!
28.25x14
9x20
29.30-24(?)
3-9!
diagram 1
30.43-39?
This move is very logical, but Shvartsman misses the cunning combination that Van Berkel has brought into play.
18-23!!
The idea of this combination is well known, but in this particular setting where black makes a backward capture with piece 28, it is extremely rare. That's why afterwards Van Berkel stated that he seriously took into account that his famous opponent would miss it.
31.29x7
20x29
32.34x23
28x19
33.37x28
8-12
34.7x18
13x35
35.31-27
9-13
36.42-38
13-18
37.47-42
6-11
38.38-32
15-20
39.42-38
20-24
40.41-37
19-23
41.38-33
17-22
42.33-29
22x42
43.29x20
42-47
44.20-14
47-41
45.14-9
41x28
46.45-40
35x44
47.49x40
28-39
48.9-3
39-25
49.3-26
23-28
50.26-37
25-34 and white resigned. With this victory Van Berkel laid the foundation for his first place.
Jean Marc Ndjofang - Kees Romijn 0-2
32.48-43?
Ndjofang misses the spectacular combination
≡
32.27-22
18x27
33.32x21
23x43
34.37-31!!
16x29
35.34x3
43x34
36.40x29
24x33
37.35-30
25x34
38.3x4 W+
≡
11-17
33.27-21
16x27
34.32x21
23x32
35.37x28
18-22
36.42-37
24-30
37.35x24
19x30
38.41-36
30-35
39.21-16(?)
35x44
40.39x50
20-24!
diagram 1
Now white is confronted with the threat
25-30
41.34x25
24-29
42.33x24
22x31
43.36x27 . But there is a hidden combination that plays an even bigger role. After the logical move
≡
41.38-32? black can play
26-31!
42.36x7
17-21
43.16x27
8-12
44.7x18
13x42 . Although this combination is not winning for black, Ndjofang decides to avoid it and plays a very risky move instead.
≡
41.28-23?
24-29!
Romijn has another trick up his sleeve. With a little forcing he now gains a piece, and subsequently wins the game.
42.33x24
13-18!
43.23-19
17-21
44.16x27
22x33
45.50-44
18-22
46.45-40
9-14
47.19x10
15x4
48.34-29
12-18
49.29x38
26-31
50.36x27
22x31
51.38-32
18-23
52.43-38
Aleksej Domchev - Alexander Shvartsman 0-2
In the last round Shvartsman showed his class with a beautiful victory against fellow grandmaster Domchev.
6-11!
25.34-30
11-17
26.42-37
7-12
27.30-25?!
Domchev accepts the challenge to lock up the black left wing. Due to this we will witness an exciting middle game.
21-26
28.37-32
26x37
29.32x41
17-22
30.28x17
12x21
31.38-32
8-12
32.41-37
3-8
33.32-28
21-26
34.40-34
diagram 1
18-22!
35.28x17
12x21
Instead of simplifying the position with
≡
24-30
35.35x24
19x39
36.43x34
20-24
37.29x20
15x24 , Shvartsman decides to go all in. The black left wing will now be completely entangled, so there is no way back anymore.
≡
36.34-30
13-18
37.43-38(?)
A good alternative was
≡
37.45-40!
9-13
38.40-34 and both after 1)
8-12
39.43-38
21-27
40.49-44
12-17
41.44-40
18-23
42.29x9
14x3
43.25x23
17-21
44.30x19
27-31
45.36x27
21x41 or 2)
≡
18-22
39.29-23
19x39
40.30x10
15x4
41.25x14
39x30
42.35x24 white has the better position.
≡
9-13!
38.49-43
After
≡
38.29-23
19x39
39.30x10
15x4
40.25x14 black plays
18-23! Then white can defend with
41.35-30
13-19
42.45-40
19x10
43.40-34 , but black clearly has the better position.
≡
18-22
39.38-32
22-27
40.43-38
13-18
41.45-40?
This is the decisive mistake. With the problematic
≡
41.48-43!
18-22
42.29-23! (note that
≡
42.32-28? doesn't work due to
8-13
43.28x17
21x12
44.43-39 or?
27-31!
45.36x27
19-23!
46.30x17
23x12 B+)
≡
19x48
43.30x10
15x4
44.25x14
48x31
45.14-9
4x13
46.38-33
27x29
47.36x9 white could still force a draw.
≡
8-12
42.48-43
12-17
43.43-39
27-31
44.36x27
17-22
45.40-34
22x42
46.38x47
21-27
47.32x21
16x27
48.47-42
26-31
Leopold Sekongo - Lucien Farzan 2-0
1-6(?)
18.28-22!
With this move, Sekongo completely immobilizes the black right wing.
20-24
19.49-44
4-10?
After this move the position may already be lost for black. The most accurate defense was
≡
24-30!
20.35x24
19x30 , with an equal position.
≡
20.34-29!
19-23
21.29x20
15x24
22.33-29
24x33
23.39x19
14x23
24.43-39
9-14
25.48-43
3-9
26.35-30
25x34
27.40x29
23x34
28.39x30
14-20
29.43-39
9-14
30.44-40
20-24
31.30x19
14x23
32.40-35
10-14
33.35-30
23-29
34.39-34
29x40
35.45x34 and white won convincingly.
Gerrit de Bruijn - Ibrahim Guennoun 2-0
10-15
≡
After 18-23! white is in all sorts of trouble. For example
31.40-34? fails to the elementary combination
16-21
32.27x16
26-31
33.37x26
23-29
34.34x23
19x46 B+. The most logical move is therefore
≡
31.33-28
10-15!
Now
32.40-34? is still not possible due to
16-21
33.27x16
23-29
34.34x23
26-31
35.37x26
7-11
36.16x18
13x33
37.38x20
19x46 B+ Also
≡
32.38-33? loses due to
14-20! , and the white right wing is blocked. After
≡
32.41-36
7-11 white has no better than the ugly move
33.39-33 , which obstructs the piece on 42. The computer believes that white can still survive this position after
14-20
34.44-39
9-14
35.40-34
20-25
36.36-31
12-18
37.34-30
25x34
38.39x30
11-17
39.43-39
6-11
40.28-22
17x28
41.33x22
24-29
42.30-25
15-20
43.39-33
29-34
44.33-29
34-40
45.35x44
23x34
46.32-28 . But it's clear that this variant would have given great practical chances for black.
Cock van Wijk - Jean Marc Ndjofang 0-2
46.17-12?
Van Wijk was close to a draw against his strong opponent. But here he underestimates the power of a second black king. White had to sacrifice a piece with
≡
46.35-30
34x25
47.17-12 , and after
16-21
48.12-8
21-26
49.8-2
26-31
51.48-42
31-36
52.2-16 the endgame is a draw.
≡
34-39!
47.12-8
39-44
48.8-3
44-50
49.35-30
46-41
50.30-25
41-47!
Ndjofang correctly judges that control of the main diagonal is not even needed. For example, after
51.3-14
6-11
52.14-32
11-17
53.32-14
17-22
54.14-19
22-27! white has to give up the diagonal anyhow, since
55.19-37? quickly loses after
47-33! B+
≡
51.3-26
50-28
52.48-43
28-14
53.26-12
14-32
54.43-39
32-28
Harry de Waard - Anton van Berkel 0-2
In this superior position for black something inexplicable happened:
11-17?
28.40-35? Both players missed the standard maneuver
≡
28.30-24
19x30
29.34-29
23x34
30.32x23
18x29
31.33x35 , and white wins a piece.
Peter Frans Koops - Ibrahim Guennoun 0-2
20-25?
Black could immediately win using the combination
≡
13-19
21.24x13
4-10
22.13x4
3-9
23.4x13
18x9
24.27x18
12x45
25.44-40
45x34
26.39x30
20-25
27.30-24
9-13 , and the outpost on 24 cannot be defended.
Lucien Farzan - Henk Ruesink 2-0
After
6-11? white won the game using the hidden combination
24.27-22!
18x27
25.32x21
16x27
26.25-20
14x25
27.35-30
25x32
28.37x6
Jan Ongolesono - Frits Stuger 2-0
43-48?
It looks like black is lost, but with a Coup Turc he could have saved the game:
≡
23-28!
61.4x39
33x44 (or
≡
61.4x15
43-48 etc).
≡
61.4x26
Marcel Everloo - Gerrit de Bruijn 0-2
In this position De Bruijn decided the game using a combination:
24-29!
32.33x24
16-21
33.27x16
17-22
34.28x17
12x21
35.16x27
23-28
36.32x14
9x49
© Wieger Wesselink https://10x10.org